Los Angeles

Four brands shouldn’t mean four ways to shop.

Four brands on one structure: the same journey in each app, then each identity takes the frame while the structure holds.

Intro

Abercrombie & Fitch, Hollister, Gilly Hicks, and Social Tourist serve different audiences through distinct brand identities. The shopping experience still needs a coherent logic: find a product, understand its fit, share a selection, complete a purchase, and handle what comes afterward. The challenge was giving those tasks a shared structure without flattening the brands.

I owned the UX design of the mobile shopping experiences shown here, from journey architecture through interaction and interface design. The work establishes what stays consistent as the brand changes, the shopping task changes, or another person takes responsibility for completing the purchase.

The flows span visual search, styling and fit, matching sets, shared shopping and purchase approval, store context, and order updates and returns.

Role / Scope

  • Senior UX Designer
  • journey architecture
  • product discovery
  • interaction design
  • interface design
  • prototyping

Let behavior stay familiar while the brand changes.

The comparison across the four designs makes the boundary visible. The system supplies the framework; each brand controls how it introduces its world and its products. Selecting a product, inspecting it, or moving toward the bag has a recognizable logic even when the surrounding presentation changes.

Abercrombie & Fitch — shared commerce, distinct brands
What stays consistent across the four brands and where each behaves differently: the brand layer, the shared commerce behaviors, and the context a customer carries through every stage. A model of the designed system.

Carry the selection when responsibility changes.

I treated these as distinct journeys with a shared requirement: preserve the selection and make the next responsibility clear. One moves between people; the other moves between fulfillment options.

Abercrombie & Fitch — handoffs between people and channels
What survives each handoff: a purchase request moving from the shopper to a parent, and a search that starts in a store continuing online. A model of the designed flows.

One model, with room for four identities.

The work demonstrates the value of defining shared behavior at the scale of the whole experience. It makes room for four distinct identities and a substantial range of tasks, while preserving the context people need as their decisions change.

Standardize behavior, not identity.

The strongest system decision was separating what customers need to learn from what each brand needs to express. When those layers have clear responsibilities, consistency can support distinction instead of erasing it.